<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 207 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31078</link>
    <description>The Tribunal balanced the service tax liability on turnkey projects, jurisdictional issues, and the invocation of the extended period for demanding duty. It considered the specifics of the contracts, financial challenges faced by the company, and the partial pre-deposit made. The Tribunal directed the applicants to deposit a further sum within a specified period, waived pre-deposit of service tax and penalties, and stayed recovery pending appeal resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 207 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31078</link>
      <description>The Tribunal balanced the service tax liability on turnkey projects, jurisdictional issues, and the invocation of the extended period for demanding duty. It considered the specifics of the contracts, financial challenges faced by the company, and the partial pre-deposit made. The Tribunal directed the applicants to deposit a further sum within a specified period, waived pre-deposit of service tax and penalties, and stayed recovery pending appeal resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>