<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1279 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305363</link>
    <description>Successive bail applications require a substantial change in circumstances directly affecting an earlier rejection; grounds already considered cannot be re-agitated as a review of that rejection. Prolonged undertrial detention may engage the Article 21 right to speedy trial where proceedings remain stalled despite directions for expeditious trial and the accused is not responsible for delay. In grave economic-offence allegations supported by a strong prima facie case, regular bail may remain inappropriate, but limited interim bail can balance personal liberty against the seriousness of the accusation, trial stage and conduct during earlier interim release. Trial courts may regulate cross-examination under the Evidence Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 06:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1279 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305363</link>
      <description>Successive bail applications require a substantial change in circumstances directly affecting an earlier rejection; grounds already considered cannot be re-agitated as a review of that rejection. Prolonged undertrial detention may engage the Article 21 right to speedy trial where proceedings remain stalled despite directions for expeditious trial and the accused is not responsible for delay. In grave economic-offence allegations supported by a strong prima facie case, regular bail may remain inappropriate, but limited interim bail can balance personal liberty against the seriousness of the accusation, trial stage and conduct during earlier interim release. Trial courts may regulate cross-examination under the Evidence Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>