<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1219 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305351</link>
    <description>Compensation for coal land acquisition remained unpaid despite the land having vested in the Central Government and then in the company. On the special facts, the Court accepted a mutually agreed mechanism for re-survey, identification of genuine landowners, determination of possession, consideration of de-notification for unsuitable land, and assessment of compensation, including where possession had not been taken. The arrangement was approved as serving fairness and justice, but the Court modified it by constituting the Claims Commission itself, fixing its composition, directing cooperation from the State and the company, and requiring the report to be placed before the Court for further directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 18:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1219 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305351</link>
      <description>Compensation for coal land acquisition remained unpaid despite the land having vested in the Central Government and then in the company. On the special facts, the Court accepted a mutually agreed mechanism for re-survey, identification of genuine landowners, determination of possession, consideration of de-notification for unsuitable land, and assessment of compensation, including where possession had not been taken. The arrangement was approved as serving fairness and justice, but the Court modified it by constituting the Claims Commission itself, fixing its composition, directing cooperation from the State and the company, and requiring the report to be placed before the Court for further directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>