<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1307 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430883</link>
    <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s mandamus petition challenging tax refund rejection. Court set aside previous orders and directed tax authority to reassess refund claim within three months, considering submitted documents and legal provisions. The decision emphasized proper evaluation of evidence and compliance with existing notifications and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1307 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430883</link>
      <description>HC allowed petitioner&#039;s mandamus petition challenging tax refund rejection. Court set aside previous orders and directed tax authority to reassess refund claim within three months, considering submitted documents and legal provisions. The decision emphasized proper evaluation of evidence and compliance with existing notifications and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>