https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430882 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision to quash the reopening of assessment for A.Y. 2008-09. The Court held that the subsequent notice dated 18.01.2016 was unnecessary as reasons for reopening were already provided after the first notice. The Assessment Order was upheld, and the assessee was directed to challenge it on merits before the CIT-A within four weeks, barring re-agitation of the reopening legality issue. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Jun 2026 10:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430882 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court's decision to quash the reopening of assessment for A.Y. 2008-09. The Court held that the subsequent notice dated 18.01.2016 was unnecessary as reasons for reopening were already provided after the first notice. The Assessment Order was upheld, and the assessee was directed to challenge it on merits before the CIT-A within four weeks, barring re-agitation of the reopening legality issue. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430882