https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31072 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the Commissioner's decision that the appellant, despite also being a sub-broker, was liable to pay Service tax as a stock-broker due to providing taxable services by buying and selling securities. The Tribunal affirmed the applicability of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, requiring the appellant to deposit the collected Service tax amount with the Central Government. The Commissioner's order was deemed valid, emphasizing the importance of regulatory definitions in determining tax liabilities. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31072 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the Commissioner's decision that the appellant, despite also being a sub-broker, was liable to pay Service tax as a stock-broker due to providing taxable services by buying and selling securities. The Tribunal affirmed the applicability of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, requiring the appellant to deposit the collected Service tax amount with the Central Government. The Commissioner's order was deemed valid, emphasizing the importance of regulatory definitions in determining tax liabilities. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31072