<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1294 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) exceeded jurisdiction by invoking Section 263 to correct the Assessing Officer&#039;s incorrect initiation of penalty proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the separation of penalty and assessment proceedings, ruling that the PCIT cannot direct the AO to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 263. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, leading to the quashing of the PCIT&#039;s orders under Section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1294 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) exceeded jurisdiction by invoking Section 263 to correct the Assessing Officer&#039;s incorrect initiation of penalty proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the separation of penalty and assessment proceedings, ruling that the PCIT cannot direct the AO to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 263. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, leading to the quashing of the PCIT&#039;s orders under Section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>