<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1293 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430869</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the reopening of the assessment was invalid as it was solely based on audit objections without new material. The reassessment was quashed, citing precedents that internal audit objections cannot be the sole basis for reopening under section 148 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 07:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1293 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430869</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the reopening of the assessment was invalid as it was solely based on audit objections without new material. The reassessment was quashed, citing precedents that internal audit objections cannot be the sole basis for reopening under section 148 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>