<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1291 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430867</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2010-11 and AY 2013-14, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the disallowances made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of commercial expediency, the timing of liability crystallization, and the nature of the expenditure in its judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1291 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430867</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2010-11 and AY 2013-14, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete the disallowances made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the principles of commercial expediency, the timing of liability crystallization, and the nature of the expenditure in its judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>