<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1290 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430866</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the validity of a valuation report submitted by the DVO under section 142A(6) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal deemed the delayed report non-est in the eyes of the law, as it exceeded the prescribed time limit. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions and the absence of a stay on its order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1290 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430866</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the validity of a valuation report submitted by the DVO under section 142A(6) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal deemed the delayed report non-est in the eyes of the law, as it exceeded the prescribed time limit. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions and the absence of a stay on its order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>