<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430863</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 for the assessment year 2017-18. The PCIT&#039;s attempt to tax deemed rent on unsold property held as stock in trade was deemed erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal held that the PCIT exceeded its jurisdiction as the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was found to be correct. The appeal was allowed, and the PCIT&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 07:28:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1287 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430863</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 for the assessment year 2017-18. The PCIT&#039;s attempt to tax deemed rent on unsold property held as stock in trade was deemed erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal held that the PCIT exceeded its jurisdiction as the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was found to be correct. The appeal was allowed, and the PCIT&#039;s order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>