https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430862 The court found the impugned communication flawed and lacking legal authority. The petitioner was accused of involvement in fraudulent duty drawback claims but admitted to certain exports and duty drawback claims. Provisional attachment orders were issued and not challenged by the petitioner. The court highlighted the importance of receiving sale proceeds within the FEMA timeframe. The duty drawback amount was directed to be remitted to revenue, with the petitioner allowed to operate the bank account. The adjudicating authority was instructed to conclude proceedings promptly. en-us Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Nov 2022 11:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430862 The court found the impugned communication flawed and lacking legal authority. The petitioner was accused of involvement in fraudulent duty drawback claims but admitted to certain exports and duty drawback claims. Provisional attachment orders were issued and not challenged by the petitioner. The court highlighted the importance of receiving sale proceeds within the FEMA timeframe. The duty drawback amount was directed to be remitted to revenue, with the petitioner allowed to operate the bank account. The adjudicating authority was instructed to conclude proceedings promptly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 21 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430862