<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1298 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305341</link>
    <description>Statutory recruitment regulations governing the ESIC teaching cadre prevailed over the DACP Scheme because the regulations framed under the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act, 1948 had statutory force. The 2008 Regulations required four years&#039; qualifying service, and the 2015 Regulations, made with Central Government approval, superseded them and required five years&#039; service. Executive instructions, recruitment advertisements and internal references to DACP could not override or confer rights inconsistent with the regulations, and counsel&#039;s concession on a question of law did not create an estoppel against the statute. The DACP Scheme was held inapplicable and the 2015 Regulations governed promotions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 05:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1298 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305341</link>
      <description>Statutory recruitment regulations governing the ESIC teaching cadre prevailed over the DACP Scheme because the regulations framed under the Employees&#039; State Insurance Act, 1948 had statutory force. The 2008 Regulations required four years&#039; qualifying service, and the 2015 Regulations, made with Central Government approval, superseded them and required five years&#039; service. Executive instructions, recruitment advertisements and internal references to DACP could not override or confer rights inconsistent with the regulations, and counsel&#039;s concession on a question of law did not create an estoppel against the statute. The DACP Scheme was held inapplicable and the 2015 Regulations governed promotions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>