<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1434 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305340</link>
    <description>An unregistered agreement to sell does not transfer any right, title or interest in immovable property, because such property can be conveyed only by a registered instrument. The limited protection of part performance is available only as a defence by the transferor or a person claiming under the transferor, and cannot by itself defeat attachment or create membership rights in a co-operative society. On the facts, the alleged agreement was doubted, the original document was not produced, the signature was disputed, and the transfer was not disclosed in the relevant proceedings. The claim based on the agreement therefore failed, and no enforceable interest in the suit property was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 05:17:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1434 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305340</link>
      <description>An unregistered agreement to sell does not transfer any right, title or interest in immovable property, because such property can be conveyed only by a registered instrument. The limited protection of part performance is available only as a defence by the transferor or a person claiming under the transferor, and cannot by itself defeat attachment or create membership rights in a co-operative society. On the facts, the alleged agreement was doubted, the original document was not produced, the signature was disputed, and the transfer was not disclosed in the relevant proceedings. The claim based on the agreement therefore failed, and no enforceable interest in the suit property was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>