<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (5) TMI 56 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305330</link>
    <description>A person lawfully cultivating agricultural land under a mortgagee in possession can qualify as a deemed tenant under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, because the statutory protection extends beyond contractual tenancy and depends on lawful cultivation unless specifically excluded. The Court also held that possession obtained without an order of the Mamlatdar, contrary to Section 29(2), involved a jurisdictional error, so supervisory interference under Article 227 was justified. The result was that the respondent&#039;s deemed tenancy was upheld and the High Court&#039;s intervention was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 15:26:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (5) TMI 56 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305330</link>
      <description>A person lawfully cultivating agricultural land under a mortgagee in possession can qualify as a deemed tenant under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, because the statutory protection extends beyond contractual tenancy and depends on lawful cultivation unless specifically excluded. The Court also held that possession obtained without an order of the Mamlatdar, contrary to Section 29(2), involved a jurisdictional error, so supervisory interference under Article 227 was justified. The result was that the respondent&#039;s deemed tenancy was upheld and the High Court&#039;s intervention was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>