<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1254 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430830</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, confirming the addition of Rs.1,27,71,907/- to the assessee&#039;s income, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient to counter the findings of the Income Tax Investigation Directorate regarding bogus LTCG transactions. The appellant&#039;s claims of arbitrary assessment and violation of natural justice were rejected, emphasizing the burden of proof on the assessee to establish transaction genuineness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1254 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430830</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision, confirming the addition of Rs.1,27,71,907/- to the assessee&#039;s income, dismissing the appeal. The Tribunal found the evidence insufficient to counter the findings of the Income Tax Investigation Directorate regarding bogus LTCG transactions. The appellant&#039;s claims of arbitrary assessment and violation of natural justice were rejected, emphasizing the burden of proof on the assessee to establish transaction genuineness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>