<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1246 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the excess depreciation claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) correctly applied the provisions of Section 43(1) and relied on relevant judicial precedents, finding no merit in the Revenue&#039;s grounds. The disallowance of depreciation was deemed unwarranted, and the order was pronounced on 30/09/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:14:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1246 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the excess depreciation claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) correctly applied the provisions of Section 43(1) and relied on relevant judicial precedents, finding no merit in the Revenue&#039;s grounds. The disallowance of depreciation was deemed unwarranted, and the order was pronounced on 30/09/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>