https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430808 In a PMLA prosecution, where the accused was consciously not arrested during investigation, had cooperated under section 50, and was later produced only after summoning, the rigour of section 45 was not treated as an automatic bar to bail on those facts. The analysis distinguished cases involving prior arrest or existing incarceration and relied on the interpretation of Satender Kumar Antil and section 170 CrPC. It concluded that further arrest was unnecessary merely because the accused appeared before court after process, and rejected a contrary reading that would require section 45 conditions to be satisfied in every such case. en-us Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430808 In a PMLA prosecution, where the accused was consciously not arrested during investigation, had cooperated under section 50, and was later produced only after summoning, the rigour of section 45 was not treated as an automatic bar to bail on those facts. The analysis distinguished cases involving prior arrest or existing incarceration and relied on the interpretation of Satender Kumar Antil and section 170 CrPC. It concluded that further arrest was unnecessary merely because the accused appeared before court after process, and rejected a contrary reading that would require section 45 conditions to be satisfied in every such case. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 25 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430808