<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1226 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430802</link>
    <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and remanding the case for verification and recalculation of the refund amount within a specified timeframe. The Appellant was granted a refund for service taxes paid between specific dates, with directions for verification and recalculating the refund amount. The Respondent-Department was directed to refund the recalculated amount within two months following the completion of the process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 09:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1226 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430802</link>
      <description>The CESTAT allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order and remanding the case for verification and recalculation of the refund amount within a specified timeframe. The Appellant was granted a refund for service taxes paid between specific dates, with directions for verification and recalculating the refund amount. The Respondent-Department was directed to refund the recalculated amount within two months following the completion of the process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>