https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305303 Where notice after cheque dishonour could not be served because the drawer was not found at the address, the payee was not defeated in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The cause of action arose only after valid service of the third notice and expiry of the statutory fifteen-day period without payment; a complaint filed within thirty days thereafter was within limitation. The concurrent finding that the third notice was duly served was a finding of fact, and the revisional court was not justified in disturbing it. The complaint was therefore not time-barred and the statutory requirements of Section 138 were satisfied. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:11:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305303 Where notice after cheque dishonour could not be served because the drawer was not found at the address, the payee was not defeated in a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The cause of action arose only after valid service of the third notice and expiry of the statutory fifteen-day period without payment; a complaint filed within thirty days thereafter was within limitation. The concurrent finding that the third notice was duly served was a finding of fact, and the revisional court was not justified in disturbing it. The complaint was therefore not time-barred and the statutory requirements of Section 138 were satisfied. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305303