<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1200 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430776</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowance under Section 14A and bogus purchases but reversing the decision on commission expenses. The Tribunal stressed the requirement for concrete evidence of services rendered to support commission expenses and maintained a cautious approach towards disallowances exceeding exempted income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2022 21:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1200 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430776</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on disallowance under Section 14A and bogus purchases but reversing the decision on commission expenses. The Tribunal stressed the requirement for concrete evidence of services rendered to support commission expenses and maintained a cautious approach towards disallowances exceeding exempted income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>