<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1197 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 4,56,87,000/- and Rs. 2,82,00,000/- under section 68, ruling that these amounts constituted opening balances and could not be treated as unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal supported this conclusion with legal precedents and found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s judgment. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2022 10:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1197 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions of Rs. 4,56,87,000/- and Rs. 2,82,00,000/- under section 68, ruling that these amounts constituted opening balances and could not be treated as unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal supported this conclusion with legal precedents and found no error in the CIT(A)&#039;s judgment. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>