<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1476 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, granting the appellant the liberty to seek redress with the appropriate authority as prescribed by law. The decision clarified the jurisdictional aspect regarding the rebate of tax arising from exports, the denial of specific benefits under relevant notifications, and the refund of tax on input services for exporters, emphasizing adherence to the appropriate legal provisions for seeking remedies in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2022 20:36:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=697010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1476 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, granting the appellant the liberty to seek redress with the appropriate authority as prescribed by law. The decision clarified the jurisdictional aspect regarding the rebate of tax arising from exports, the denial of specific benefits under relevant notifications, and the refund of tax on input services for exporters, emphasizing adherence to the appropriate legal provisions for seeking remedies in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>