<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 58 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted M/s. Operational Energy Group India Pvt. Ltd. a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of dues, disagreeing with the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation that the operation of power plants fell under the management of immovable property category for service tax purposes. The Tribunal held that charges for operating power plants did not constitute management of immovable property, providing relief to the appellant and emphasizing the significance of accurate legal interpretation in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 58 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted M/s. Operational Energy Group India Pvt. Ltd. a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of dues, disagreeing with the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation that the operation of power plants fell under the management of immovable property category for service tax purposes. The Tribunal held that charges for operating power plants did not constitute management of immovable property, providing relief to the appellant and emphasizing the significance of accurate legal interpretation in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>