<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 122 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31045</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit in a service tax appeal was considered appropriate where the disputed liability depended on whether the recipient of specified services was liable to tax for the relevant period, an issue already pending before a Larger Bench. The extent of the disputed period also supported dispensing with the deposit at that stage. Pre-deposit was therefore waived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 122 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31045</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit in a service tax appeal was considered appropriate where the disputed liability depended on whether the recipient of specified services was liable to tax for the relevant period, an issue already pending before a Larger Bench. The extent of the disputed period also supported dispensing with the deposit at that stage. Pre-deposit was therefore waived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>