<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1317 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305290</link>
    <description>The High Court declined to examine the validity of the block assessment order, citing the petitioner&#039;s pending appeal as an alternative remedy. The Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expedite the stay application&#039;s disposal within two weeks, following parameters set by the Bombay High Court. The Commissioner was instructed to decide the appeal promptly, independent of the Additional Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the stay application, due to the substantial demand involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1317 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305290</link>
      <description>The High Court declined to examine the validity of the block assessment order, citing the petitioner&#039;s pending appeal as an alternative remedy. The Court directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to expedite the stay application&#039;s disposal within two weeks, following parameters set by the Bombay High Court. The Commissioner was instructed to decide the appeal promptly, independent of the Additional Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the stay application, due to the substantial demand involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>