<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1180 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430756</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled that the revaluation of assets and crediting to partners&#039; accounts constituted a &quot;transfer&quot; under Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act, making it subject to capital gains tax. The Court emphasized the importance of interpreting &quot;otherwise&quot; to include transfers during the firm&#039;s existence to prevent tax avoidance. The Assessing Officer&#039;s order was restored, overturning the High Court and ITAT&#039;s decisions to delete the additions for short-term capital gains. The Court&#039;s decision aligned with the amended provisions and prior judgments, particularly affirming the interpretation in A.N. Naik Associates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1180 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430756</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled that the revaluation of assets and crediting to partners&#039; accounts constituted a &quot;transfer&quot; under Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act, making it subject to capital gains tax. The Court emphasized the importance of interpreting &quot;otherwise&quot; to include transfers during the firm&#039;s existence to prevent tax avoidance. The Assessing Officer&#039;s order was restored, overturning the High Court and ITAT&#039;s decisions to delete the additions for short-term capital gains. The Court&#039;s decision aligned with the amended provisions and prior judgments, particularly affirming the interpretation in A.N. Naik Associates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>