<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1175 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430751</link>
    <description>The Court referred several questions of law to a larger bench, including territorial jurisdiction, forum non conveniens, impact of NaFAC&#039;s presence in Delhi, right to choose forum, and res judicata. The matter was referred to the Chief Justice for the constitution of a larger bench to provide a definitive ruling on these issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1175 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430751</link>
      <description>The Court referred several questions of law to a larger bench, including territorial jurisdiction, forum non conveniens, impact of NaFAC&#039;s presence in Delhi, right to choose forum, and res judicata. The matter was referred to the Chief Justice for the constitution of a larger bench to provide a definitive ruling on these issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>