<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1170 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430746</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under section 271D due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to record satisfaction, rendering the penalty void ab initio and bad in law. The Tribunal did not address other grounds as the primary issue was resolved, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1170 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430746</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty order under section 271D due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to record satisfaction, rendering the penalty void ab initio and bad in law. The Tribunal did not address other grounds as the primary issue was resolved, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>