<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430740</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals concerning unexplained expenditure deletion and ESOP expenses allowance, citing consistent findings and lack of new evidence. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue on the deduction of education cess due to the retrospective effect of the Finance Act 2022. The decisions were based on legal precedents and the absence of material changes in circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1164 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430740</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals concerning unexplained expenditure deletion and ESOP expenses allowance, citing consistent findings and lack of new evidence. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue on the deduction of education cess due to the retrospective effect of the Finance Act 2022. The decisions were based on legal precedents and the absence of material changes in circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>