<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 56 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31041</link>
    <description>Appellate stay relief concerning input service credit on employee welfare services, including health insurance, canteen facilities and employee transportation, focused on the pre-deposit requirement pending appeal. After substantial partial pre-deposits and reliance on favourable decisions were considered, the remaining pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed until final disposal. The relief was procedural and did not determine the substantive eligibility of the claimed input service credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 56 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31041</link>
      <description>Appellate stay relief concerning input service credit on employee welfare services, including health insurance, canteen facilities and employee transportation, focused on the pre-deposit requirement pending appeal. After substantial partial pre-deposits and reliance on favourable decisions were considered, the remaining pre-deposit of duty and penalty was waived and recovery was stayed until final disposal. The relief was procedural and did not determine the substantive eligibility of the claimed input service credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>