https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430726 The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant accused of offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the Customs Act, 1962, involving the diversion of gold jewelry. Despite being in custody, the Court found it appropriate to grant bail due to pending investigations and trial readiness. Specific conditions were imposed. The Court also upheld the bail granted to the appellant's son, noting the lack of specific allegations against him beyond assisting his father. The Court dismissed the challenge to the son's bail, emphasizing that its observations should not impact the case's merits. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jul 2023 17:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430726 The Supreme Court granted bail to the appellant accused of offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and the Customs Act, 1962, involving the diversion of gold jewelry. Despite being in custody, the Court found it appropriate to grant bail due to pending investigations and trial readiness. Specific conditions were imposed. The Court also upheld the bail granted to the appellant's son, noting the lack of specific allegations against him beyond assisting his father. The Court dismissed the challenge to the son's bail, emphasizing that its observations should not impact the case's merits. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430726