https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430716 Cut-off date, statutory applicability, rehabilitation benefits and resettlement entitlements were addressed in relation to land acquisition for displaced villages. The discussion states that September 2010 was accepted as the common reckoning date for compensation, with finalized awards left undisturbed. It further explains that the 2013 land acquisition framework applied only to pending, unapproved villages after the relevant notification, while the amended 2006 rehabilitation policy governed employment benefits with a restricted family-based entitlement. Where resettlement plots were unavailable, lump sum cash compensation was discussed as payable, and the Third Schedule amenities and Scheduled Tribe/Scheduled Caste protections were treated as mandatory in resettlement areas. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430716 Cut-off date, statutory applicability, rehabilitation benefits and resettlement entitlements were addressed in relation to land acquisition for displaced villages. The discussion states that September 2010 was accepted as the common reckoning date for compensation, with finalized awards left undisturbed. It further explains that the 2013 land acquisition framework applied only to pending, unapproved villages after the relevant notification, while the amended 2006 rehabilitation policy governed employment benefits with a restricted family-based entitlement. Where resettlement plots were unavailable, lump sum cash compensation was discussed as payable, and the Third Schedule amenities and Scheduled Tribe/Scheduled Caste protections were treated as mandatory in resettlement areas. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430716