<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1120 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430696</link>
    <description>Goods and conveyance detained under the CGST/SGST regime were required to be released where the petitioner offered compliance with the conditions in Section 129(1)(c). The refusal to accept the bank guarantee and keep the goods withheld pending adjudication was held unjustified once the statutory conditions were satisfied or offered for compliance. On that basis, release without further delay was directed, leaving the Section 129 proceedings to be finalised separately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1120 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430696</link>
      <description>Goods and conveyance detained under the CGST/SGST regime were required to be released where the petitioner offered compliance with the conditions in Section 129(1)(c). The refusal to accept the bank guarantee and keep the goods withheld pending adjudication was held unjustified once the statutory conditions were satisfied or offered for compliance. On that basis, release without further delay was directed, leaving the Section 129 proceedings to be finalised separately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>