<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1116 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430692</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made under sections 68 and 69C of the Income Tax Act. It found that the new evidences accepted without remand to the A.O. were valid and adequately explained, leading to the dismissal of all grounds of appeal raised by the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:07:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1116 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430692</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made under sections 68 and 69C of the Income Tax Act. It found that the new evidences accepted without remand to the A.O. were valid and adequately explained, leading to the dismissal of all grounds of appeal raised by the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>