<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1115 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow the section 54 deduction claim of Rs.77,48,507, holding that the assessee complied with the eligibility criteria. The Tribunal considered the detailed payment schedule, possession conditions, and bank statement as crucial evidence, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the appeal against the CIT(A), Pune-3&#039;s order for AY 2013-14.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:07:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1115 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; decision to disallow the section 54 deduction claim of Rs.77,48,507, holding that the assessee complied with the eligibility criteria. The Tribunal considered the detailed payment schedule, possession conditions, and bank statement as crucial evidence, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the appeal against the CIT(A), Pune-3&#039;s order for AY 2013-14.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>