<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1111 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee by maintaining the treatment of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) as capital gains rather than business income. The Tribunal found no grounds to overturn the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing consistency in treatment in previous assessment years and the detailed explanations provided by the assessee. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1111 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee by maintaining the treatment of Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) and Short Term Capital Gain (STCG) as capital gains rather than business income. The Tribunal found no grounds to overturn the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing consistency in treatment in previous assessment years and the detailed explanations provided by the assessee. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>