<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1106 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430682</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges are distinct from rent and should be subject to TDS under Section 194C at 2%, not under Section 194-I at 10%. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and set aside demands for interest on short deduction of TDS under Section 201(1A). This decision underscores the need to differentiate between payments for exclusive property use and payments for common area maintenance when applying TDS provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1106 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430682</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges are distinct from rent and should be subject to TDS under Section 194C at 2%, not under Section 194-I at 10%. The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and set aside demands for interest on short deduction of TDS under Section 201(1A). This decision underscores the need to differentiate between payments for exclusive property use and payments for common area maintenance when applying TDS provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>