<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 198 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31028</link>
    <description>Mere assertions of misplacement of records and delayed handing over of papers, unsupported by corroborative material, were held insufficient to justify condonation of a 355-day delay in filing an appeal. The Tribunal found the affidavit and record showed only general statements without independent evidence to substantiate the cause of delay, so the condonation application was dismissed. As the appeal could not survive without condonation, the appeal and the connected interim stay applications were also dismissed consequentially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 198 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31028</link>
      <description>Mere assertions of misplacement of records and delayed handing over of papers, unsupported by corroborative material, were held insufficient to justify condonation of a 355-day delay in filing an appeal. The Tribunal found the affidavit and record showed only general statements without independent evidence to substantiate the cause of delay, so the condonation application was dismissed. As the appeal could not survive without condonation, the appeal and the connected interim stay applications were also dismissed consequentially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>