https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430676 The court granted bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.49 of 2022 under the Customs Act, 1962 Sections 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b). The court considered the applicant's role as a mere employee of the importer, the proper procedures followed by the firm, and the absence of a demand notice for duty payment. Emphasizing the lack of criminal history and the continuing bond securing duty payment, bail was granted with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. en-us Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:07:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430676 The court granted bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.49 of 2022 under the Customs Act, 1962 Sections 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b). The court considered the applicant's role as a mere employee of the importer, the proper procedures followed by the firm, and the absence of a demand notice for duty payment. Emphasizing the lack of criminal history and the continuing bond securing duty payment, bail was granted with conditions to prevent tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430676