https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430672 The Tribunal found that an appeal is maintainable under section 9C of the Tariff Act against the Central Government's decision not to impose anti-dumping duty. It held that the Central Government's functions under section 9A are quasi-judicial and emphasized the need for a reasoned order. The Tribunal stated that non-communication of the decision within the stipulated period implies a decision not to impose duty. It set aside the office memorandums and remitted the matters back to the Central Government for reconsideration, requiring adherence to natural justice principles and provision of reasons for the decision. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430672 The Tribunal found that an appeal is maintainable under section 9C of the Tariff Act against the Central Government's decision not to impose anti-dumping duty. It held that the Central Government's functions under section 9A are quasi-judicial and emphasized the need for a reasoned order. The Tribunal stated that non-communication of the decision within the stipulated period implies a decision not to impose duty. It set aside the office memorandums and remitted the matters back to the Central Government for reconsideration, requiring adherence to natural justice principles and provision of reasons for the decision. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430672