https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430658 Revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is supervisory and cannot be used as a second appeal; interference with concurrent findings is justified only for perversity, gross unreasonableness, absence of material, or miscarriage of justice. In cheque dishonour prosecutions, proof of execution of the cheque and the transaction activates the presumptions of consideration and legally enforceable liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act, rebuttable only on a preponderance of probabilities. A signed blank cheque and the company's liquidation, on the facts noted, do not by themselves rebut those presumptions. The conviction and sentence were affirmed. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Nov 2022 08:06:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430658 Revisional jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is supervisory and cannot be used as a second appeal; interference with concurrent findings is justified only for perversity, gross unreasonableness, absence of material, or miscarriage of justice. In cheque dishonour prosecutions, proof of execution of the cheque and the transaction activates the presumptions of consideration and legally enforceable liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act, rebuttable only on a preponderance of probabilities. A signed blank cheque and the company's liquidation, on the facts noted, do not by themselves rebut those presumptions. The conviction and sentence were affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430658