https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305267 A superior court exercising revisional or appellate jurisdiction should ordinarily decide a matter on merits where the subordinate court has already adjudicated the objections; remand is justified only in exceptional cases, such as failure to decide material issues, procedural prejudice, or genuine need for additional evidence. On that basis, the revisional court was said to be unjustified in remanding the execution matter to the executing court, and the request to file additional documents was unwarranted because the legality of the order could be determined on the existing record. The impugned orders were set aside and the revision was restored for fresh decision on merits. en-us Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Nov 2022 23:19:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305267 A superior court exercising revisional or appellate jurisdiction should ordinarily decide a matter on merits where the subordinate court has already adjudicated the objections; remand is justified only in exceptional cases, such as failure to decide material issues, procedural prejudice, or genuine need for additional evidence. On that basis, the revisional court was said to be unjustified in remanding the execution matter to the executing court, and the request to file additional documents was unwarranted because the legality of the order could be determined on the existing record. The impugned orders were set aside and the revision was restored for fresh decision on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305267