<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1966 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305264</link>
    <description>Conviction for possessing property linked to a robbery and using a fake number plate was sustained on the evidence, as the recovered vehicle was connected to the robbed car and the appellant was found in possession of it. The Court also applied the reformative approach under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering the offender&#039;s background, the probation officer&#039;s report, the absence of prior criminal history, and the suitability of rehabilitation over immediate incarceration. It held that probation under Section 4 can be granted even at the appellate stage where the offender is eligible and the circumstances justify such discretion. The conviction under Sections 411 and 482 of the Indian Penal Code was affirmed, but probation was granted with a bond for peace and good behaviour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 23:19:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1966 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305264</link>
      <description>Conviction for possessing property linked to a robbery and using a fake number plate was sustained on the evidence, as the recovered vehicle was connected to the robbed car and the appellant was found in possession of it. The Court also applied the reformative approach under the Probation of Offenders Act, considering the offender&#039;s background, the probation officer&#039;s report, the absence of prior criminal history, and the suitability of rehabilitation over immediate incarceration. It held that probation under Section 4 can be granted even at the appellate stage where the offender is eligible and the circumstances justify such discretion. The conviction under Sections 411 and 482 of the Indian Penal Code was affirmed, but probation was granted with a bond for peace and good behaviour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>