<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 409 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305255</link>
    <description>An Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police was held competent to impose dismissal on a constable because the governing statute and rules permitted lawful delegation of the superior&#039;s disciplinary powers. The show-cause notice was not invalid in the circumstances, as the disciplinary authority had indicated its partial disagreement with the inquiry officer and the notice was not found to be vague. On proportionality, dismissal was found excessive for the proved misconduct of abusive language, so the penalty was reduced to stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect. The dismissal order was set aside, back wages were denied, and other consequential benefits were granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 409 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305255</link>
      <description>An Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police was held competent to impose dismissal on a constable because the governing statute and rules permitted lawful delegation of the superior&#039;s disciplinary powers. The show-cause notice was not invalid in the circumstances, as the disciplinary authority had indicated its partial disagreement with the inquiry officer and the notice was not found to be vague. On proportionality, dismissal was found excessive for the proved misconduct of abusive language, so the penalty was reduced to stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect. The dismissal order was set aside, back wages were denied, and other consequential benefits were granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>