<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 284 - HIGH COURT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31018</link>
    <description>Where concessional-duty approval and Annexure-I certificate remain in force, the Department must first set aside that approval through the prescribed statutory mechanism before invoking recovery under Section 11A; direct demand proceedings without such cancellation were jurisdictionally unsustainable. The extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11A applies only on proof of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts; disclosed facts and an approved procurement process did not establish such conduct. The show cause notices were therefore quashed as both without jurisdiction and time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 284 - HIGH COURT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31018</link>
      <description>Where concessional-duty approval and Annexure-I certificate remain in force, the Department must first set aside that approval through the prescribed statutory mechanism before invoking recovery under Section 11A; direct demand proceedings without such cancellation were jurisdictionally unsustainable. The extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11A applies only on proof of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts; disclosed facts and an approved procurement process did not establish such conduct. The show cause notices were therefore quashed as both without jurisdiction and time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>