<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1069 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430645</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the processes undertaken on the forklift trucks amounted to manufacture as they resulted in different capacities and models, qualifying for Cenvat credit. The appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs used for repair. The demands for recovery of Cenvat credit, interest, and penalties were not justified, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:07:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1069 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430645</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the processes undertaken on the forklift trucks amounted to manufacture as they resulted in different capacities and models, qualifying for Cenvat credit. The appellant was entitled to Cenvat credit on inputs used for repair. The demands for recovery of Cenvat credit, interest, and penalties were not justified, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>