<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1067 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430643</link>
    <description>The Madras HC confined relief to a direction that the State authorities consider the petitioner&#039;s representation for GST components on its own merits within a fixed time. It also allowed the petitioner to seek further time before the GST adjudicating authority, which was required to decide that request while taking the pending representation into account. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the claim for GST components or on the proposed GST demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 13:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1067 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430643</link>
      <description>The Madras HC confined relief to a direction that the State authorities consider the petitioner&#039;s representation for GST components on its own merits within a fixed time. It also allowed the petitioner to seek further time before the GST adjudicating authority, which was required to decide that request while taking the pending representation into account. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the claim for GST components or on the proposed GST demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>