<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1052 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430628</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all seven appeals by the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Act due to lack of evidence of proper notice service. The decision in the first appeal regarding notice service was applied to the remaining six appeals, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee in all cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2022 07:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=696685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1052 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430628</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all seven appeals by the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Act due to lack of evidence of proper notice service. The decision in the first appeal regarding notice service was applied to the remaining six appeals, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee in all cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=430628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>