<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 194 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, TVS Motor Co. Ltd., holding that the dealer-incurred sales promotion expenses were not includible in the assessable value of motorcycles as they were not incurred on behalf of the assessee. The Tribunal found that the dealers acted voluntarily and were not compelled by any agreement to incur such expenses. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal filed by TVS Motor Co. Ltd. was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 194 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, TVS Motor Co. Ltd., holding that the dealer-incurred sales promotion expenses were not includible in the assessable value of motorcycles as they were not incurred on behalf of the assessee. The Tribunal found that the dealers acted voluntarily and were not compelled by any agreement to incur such expenses. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal filed by TVS Motor Co. Ltd. was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>